2026 Founding Partner Programme
For a full calendar year, your physics department gets every formal assessment built from the ground up — questions designed to your school's style, your learners' world, and your department's standards. In exchange, you walk the journey with us as we figure out what this can become.
Applications close 15 August 2026
Apply Now ↓What We're Building With You
Revise It touches every stage of the assessment cycle — from question paper to department-wide insight. The pilot gives your department access to all three layers.
Every formal Physical Sciences assessment your department needs — question paper, comprehensive teacher memo, marking guide, and a learner-facing document that explains the reasoning behind every correct answer. Delivered in five days. CAPS-aligned, original, and built to your school's style.
Mark entry question by question. Sub-topic performance dashboards for every teacher. A HoD command view that lets you see the whole department — and drill down to any individual learner. The platform is already built. Pilot schools are the first departments to run on it.
Five progressive assessments released through the year — covering 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, then the full curriculum. Learners complete them, self-mark, and see where they stand sub-topic by sub-topic. Memos are released on a set schedule after each marking window. The platform can also generate variations of past questions — same concepts, different numbers and scenarios — so revision stays fresh. These papers don't exist yet. Pilot schools will help define what they become.
How This Compares
Teachers either build papers from scratch — a process that takes weeks, including originating questions and moderation rounds with colleagues — or they recycle tests from previous years that are likely already in circulation among the tutors helping this year's learners.
The teacher who set the paper writes the memo. If it's incomplete, they field a stream of queries from colleagues at moderation — because learners are infinitely creative at being wrong, and a gap in the memo creates uncertainty across the whole department.
A HoD sees class averages on a spreadsheet. No sub-topic breakdown. No way to tell whether a class underperformed because of a coverage gap, a poorly framed question, or a misconception that's been sitting in the department for years.
We're only working with three departments — so after you apply, we'll arrange a short meeting with your team.
We'll be direct about where each layer of the programme stands today, what we'll be building together, and what we'd need from your side. You'll have everything you need to decide if this is right for your department — and we'll be honest if we don't think the fit is there.
How We Measure Success
Did teachers spend less time creating and preparing tests while feeling the quality was higher than what they'd normally produce?
Did the teacher memo reduce marking time and moderation disputes? Did teachers spend less time creating post-assessment remediation materials?
Did learners understand their mistakes faster? Can this be the benchmark for years to come?
We're not offering this to twenty schools. We're offering it to three — so we can go deep, not wide. Every department gets our full attention, not a scaled-down version of it.
Tell us about your department. We'll follow up within five school days.